Prospective controlled cohort study shows improved outcomes in hospitalized patients with chronic lung conditions, suggesting integrated care benefits.
Background Patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) and post-COVID syndrome suffer from multidimensional impairment that is often incompletely addressed by pharmacotherapy alone. We evaluated a ward-based multidisciplinary pathway integrating pharmacotherapy, psychological support, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Methods In this prospective controlled cohort study, 360 hospitalized patients with CLD and post-COVID syndrome received integrated multidisciplinary care ( n = 120) or usual care ( n = 240). The primary outcomes were changes in PaCO₂, FEV₁% predicted, and CT-assessed residual radiological abnormality extent. Patient-reported outcomes, functional capacity, inflammation, and 6-month follow-up data were also assessed. Analyses used adjusted regression and IPTW. Results Integrated care was associated with greater improvements in the three primary outcomes: PaCO₂, adjusted β − 0.98 mmHg (95% CI − 1.21 to − 0.75; P < 0.001); FEV₁% predicted, adjusted β 2.35% points (95% CI 1.53 to 3.17; P < 0.001); and CT-assessed residual abnormality extent, adjusted β − 0.55% points (95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.24; P < 0.001). Integrated care was also associated with greater improvements in SGRQ score, SAS score, 15-minute walking distance, CRP, ESR, and sleep-quality score. The composite early clinical benefit rate was higher in the integrated-care group than in the usual-care group, with an adjusted OR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.21 to 3.01; P = 0.006). At 6 months, sleep quality was better and symptom-related medication use was lower, while rehospitalisation, acute exacerbation, and CT progression rates were similar between groups. Conclusions The integrated pathway was associated with broader short-term clinical improvement and lower symptom-related treatment burden at follow-up, although rehospitalisation, acute exacerbation, and CT progression rates were similar between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: