PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026The Classical World0 citations

“The Chain that Make our Life”: Prophecies of Constantinople in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man

View Full Paper
CMChris MurrayUrban Institute

Key Points

  • This analysis explores Mary Shelley’s framing of The Last Man as a sybilline prophecy influenced by Edward Gibbon and Greek tragedy.
  • Literary analysis of Mary Shelley’s The Last Man and its historical references.
  • Examination of themes of decline and prophecy as represented by Constantinople.
  • Comparison of Shelley’s narrative techniques with Gibbon’s philosophical perspectives.
  • Shelley's framing of the novel highlights Constantinople as a symbol of decline.
  • Verney’s perspective reflects a philosophical inquiry into causation versus contingency.
  • The narrative suggests a curse connected to historical figures like Constantine the Great.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Mary Shelley compels us to view her novel The Last Man (1826) through a classical aperture: the tale is framed as a sybilline prophecy. A central source for Shelley is the treatment of Constantinople in Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire . Yet while narrator Verney regards himself in the mode of Gibbon’s “philosophic spectator,” Shelley also draws on Greek tragedy to suggest that her characters have inherited a curse that originates with Constantine the Great. Constantinople looms over the novel, emblematic of decline, but Verney cannot decide whether events unfold by causation or contingency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chris Murray (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8030e02ee3982d32b7bhttps://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2025.a991175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper