Framework guides the evaluation of the Integrated Justice System from 2010 to 2016, indicating best practices and data collection needs.
The evaluation framework sets out the guide for conducting the Implementation Evaluation of IJS covering the period 2010/11 to 2015/16. Ideally the framework for evaluations for such programmes should be developed at the outset of the programme and allow for the fine-tuning of objectives, the inclusion of indicators for success and guidance on what data to collect (Quainoo, 2010). This implementation evaluation framework is informed by: ��� Local and international best practice in the evaluation of such programmes; ��� International benchmarks as drawn from an extensive literature review undertaken as the first component of this study; ��� The review of available documented information on the establishment and functioning of the IJS; ��� Alignment of the design to the specific objectives as outlined in the IJS Study Terms of Reference; ��� Pragmatic considerations of availability of data, the costs associated with use of different techniques and the time frames for implementing the study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: