Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discusses the relationship between evaluative cohesion and prospection in discourse, suggesting it as a vital organization principle.
Evaluative cohesion is the long-overlooked counterpart to propositional cohesion in discourse. While the latter has been extensively theorised within systemic-functional and text-linguistic traditions, the former remains comparatively under-described, despite its central role in how texts are interpreted and experienced. This paper argues that evaluative cohesion is intrinsically linked to a further, almost equally under-theorised dimension of discourse organisation: Sinclairian prospection, or the forward-oriented projection of expectations. Discourse unfolds principally through the continuous anticipation of what is to come. And these expectations are not neutral: they are evaluatively charged. The central claim advanced here is that texts must cohere not only propositionally but evaluatively, and prospection is the principal temporal (speech) / spatial (writing) mechanism through which evaluative cohesion is established and maintained. A series of examples - from poetry, political discourse and even popular song - illustrate how expectations are built, maintained, and sometimes deliberately disrupted for effect. I will then briefly show how corpus evidence allows us to move beyond individual texts to recurring patterns and, finally, suggest that what we are dealing with here is not a marginal phenomenon, but a central organising principle of discourse — one that, interestingly, is now being operationalised at scale by Large Language Models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Partington (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: