PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026BMC AnesthesiologyOpen Access

Continuous serratus–intercostal plane block versus intercostal cryoanalgesia for postoperative pain after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a prospective comparative observational study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SGSusana González-SuárezRRRemedios Ríos-BarreraPFPatricia Bascuñana FORNELLS

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Prospective comparison of continuous BRILMA and cryoanalgesia for postoperative pain management after minimally invasive cardiac surgery, indicating effective pain strategies.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of continuous BRILMA versus intercostal cryoanalgesia in managing postoperative pain after minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
  • Prospective comparative observational study design involving 63 consecutive adults.
  • Participants received either continuous BRILMA or intercostal cryoanalgesia based on routine practice, without randomization.
  • Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale at multiple time points up to 30 days post-surgery.
  • Pain scores decreased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001) with significant group-by-time interactions (p = 0.002).
  • BRILMA provided lower pain scores at 72 hours, while cryoanalgesia showed lower pain levels at 30 days.
  • Both techniques led to low cumulative opioid requirements in the first 72 hours, with neuropathic pain incidence being low and similar between groups.

Cite This Study

González-Suárez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8520e02ee3982d33138https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03936-3
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share