PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Reducing diarrhoea deaths in South Africa: costs and effects of scaling up essential interventions to prevent and treat diarrhoea in under-five children

View Full Paper
HCHuman Sciences Research Council

Key Points

  • This research aims to model the cost and impact of 13 essential interventions to reduce diarrhoea-related deaths in South African children under five.
  • Modelling using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).
  • Intervention coverage was projected from 2015 to 2030 based on three scenarios.
  • Data was analyzed focusing on costs, coverage increase, and mortality impact.
  • Scaling up interventions averted 3 million to 5.3 million diarrhoea cases.
  • Diarrhoea deaths are projected to drop to 2,800 in scenario one, 1,400 in scenario two, and 100 in scenario three by 2030.
  • Implementation costs range from US$510 million to US$960 million, with health system costs between US$40 million and US$170 million.

Abstract

Diarrhoea is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in South African children, accounting for approximately 20% of under-five deaths. Though progress has been made in scaling up multiple interventions to reduce diarrhoea in the last decade, challenges still remain. In this paper, we model the cost and impact of scaling up 13 interventions to prevent and treat childhood diarrhoea in South Africa. Modelling was done using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Using 2014 as the baseline, intervention coverage was increased from 2015 until 2030. Three scale up scenarios were compared: by 2030, 1) coverage of all interventions increased by ten percentage points; 2) intervention coverage increased by 20 percentage points; 3) and intervention coverage increased to 99%. The model estimates 13 million diarrhoea cases at baseline. Scaling up intervention coverage averted between 3 million and 5. 3 million diarrhoea cases. In 2030, diarrhoeal deaths are expected to reduce from an estimated 5, 500 in 2014 to 2, 800 in scenario one, 1, 400 in scenario two and 100 in scenario three. The additional cost of implementing all 13 interventions will range from US510 million (US9 per capita) to US960 million (US18 per capita), of which the health system costs range between US40 million (less than US1 per capita) and US170 million (US3 per capita). Scaling up 13 essential interventions could have a substantial impact on reducing diarrhoeal deaths in South African children, which would contribute toward reducing child mortality in the post-MDG era. Preventive measures are key and the government should focus on improving water, sanitation and hygiene. The investments required to achieve these results seem feasible considering current health expenditure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Human Sciences Research Council (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e8520e02ee3982d33183https://doi.org/10.14749/32385531
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cost and impact of scaling up interventions to save lives of mothers and children: taking South Africa closer to MDGs 4 and 52026
  2. 2Modelling the cost of community interventions to reduce child mortality in South Africa using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)2026
  3. 3Scaling up evidence-based interventions to reduce maternal and child undernutrition in 125 countries: a cost-benefit analysis2026
  4. 4Triple return on investment: the cost and impact of 13 interventions that could prevent stillbirths and save the lives of mothers and babies in South Africa2026
  5. 5Strategic planning for saving the lives of mothers, newborns and children and preventing stillbirths in KwaZulu-Natal province South Africa: modelling using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)2026