Numerical investigation evaluates seismic response in adjacent buildings, suggesting design strategies for urban environments.
This paper presents a numerical investigation of structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) effects on the seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Unlike previous studies that focused primarily on small-scale experimental models or limited parametric ranges, the present work introduces three novel aspects: (i) evaluation of SSSI effects at farther normalized building distances (d/a = 4 and 5) beyond those previously tested, (ii) quantification of seismic response changes due to asymmetric building orientations, and (iii) comparison of box versus equivalent pipe column cross-sections under identical soil and seismic excitation conditions. A finite element model was developed and validated against existing experimental data (Ali Al-Gharbi earthquake, PGA = 0.1 g), showing acceptable convergence with a PGA difference of approximately 13.4%. Subsequently, a parametric study was conducted using the Koyna earthquake record (PGA = 0.33 g) on large-scale, three-story adjacent steel buildings with one embedded story. The major quantified findings justify the following conclusions: (1) The peak ground acceleration (PGA) and roof displacement are maximized at a normalized distance of d/a = 4 (1.37 g and 151.5 mm, respectively), representing increases of 33% and 1.4% compared to d/a = 2, indicating a critical distance threshold for seismic design. (2) Asymmetric building orientation increases PGA by 14.6% but reduces frictional shear stress by 5.2%, revealing a trade-off that can be exploited in dense urban planning. (3) Replacing box columns with equivalent pipe columns increases PGA by 20.4%, roof displacement by 2.25%, and frictional shear stress by 3.0%, demonstrating the superior seismic performance of box sections. These findings provide directly actionable design guidance for minimum separation gaps, orientation strategies, and column section selection in earthquake-prone urban environments, thereby advancing both the scientific understanding and practical application of SSSI in seismic engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulaziz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: