Key result
Aortic annulus ellipticity does not affect TAVI technical success but is linked to more valve dislocation.
Why the study?
Elliptical shape of the aortic annulus has been associated with an increased risk of device failure after TAVI compared with a circular annular shape, but its impact on procedural outcomes and device performance needed assessment.
Does aortic annulus ellipticity affect procedural outcomes and device performance in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,732)
Does aortic annulus ellipticity affect procedural outcomes and device performance in patients undergoing TAVI?
Aortic annulus ellipticity does not significantly impact overall procedural success or device performance during TAVI, though it is associated with a slightly higher risk of valve dislocation or embolization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ellipticity need not alter TAVI planning; leaves open its role in embolization risk.
BACKGROUND: Elliptical shape of the aortic annulus has been associated with an increased risk of device failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared with a circular annular shape. AIMS: To assess the impact of annulus ellipticity on procedural outcomes and device performance in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: In a prospective TAVI registry, aortic annulus ellipticity was assessed by preprocedural multidetector computed tomography. The annulus ratios, defined by the ratio of minimum and maximum annulus diameters measured in a transverse double oblique plane, were split into tertiles for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: A total of 1732 patients undergoing TAVI between August 2007 and June 2020 were included in the present analysis. Patients in the tertile with the most elliptical shape of the annulus were more likely to be female (59.7% vs. 47.9%; p < 0.001) and had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (5.4 ± 3.8 vs. 4.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the rate of technical success (95.3% vs. 96.5%; p = 0.235), device success (83.6% vs. 86.5%; p = 0.118) and intended valve performance (90.7% vs. 91.7; p = 0.503) between patients in the most elliptical tertile and the rest. However, valve dislocation/embolization occurred more frequently in patients with elliptical as compared to circular annular shape (2.6% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Ellipticity of the aortic annulus does not affect procedural and device outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI irrespective of transcatheter heart valve design and generation. https:www.//clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomii et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing TAVI (n=1,732). Most elliptical shape of the aortic annulus (highest tertile) vs. Less elliptical/circular annular shape (lower tertiles) was evaluated on Technical success (p=0.235). Aortic annulus ellipticity did not significantly affect technical success (95.3% vs. 96.5%; p=0.235) or device success during TAVI, though valve dislocation was more frequent (2.6% vs. 1.2%; p=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: