Key result
Delayed-enhanced MSCT allowed differentiation between myocardial infarction and myocarditis with identical final diagnoses compared to MRI in 12 patients with acute chest pain.
Why the study?
Does delayed-enhanced MSCT accurately differentiate between myocarditis and myocardial infarction compared to MRI in patients with acute chest pain and normal coronary angiograms?
Observational (n=12)
Blinded observers
Does delayed-enhanced MSCT accurately differentiate between myocarditis and myocardial infarction compared to MRI in patients with acute chest pain and normal coronary angiograms?
Delayed-enhanced MSCT provides comparable accuracy to MRI for differentiating myocarditis from myocardial infarction in the acute phase for patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms.
May support MSCT differentiation in acute chest pain with normal angiograms; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of delayed-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MSCT) for differentiating between myocarditis and myocardial infarction in patients with normal x-ray coronary angiography. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients referred for acute chest pain and normal coronary arteries on x-ray coronary angiography were involved in this study. Delayed-enhanced MSCT and postgadolinium delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed within 36 hours and 4 days, respectively, after patient admission. Comparison between delayed-enhanced MSCT and MRI was performed by 3 independent blinded observers in term of final diagnosis, number of involved segments, and transmural extent. RESULTS: Final diagnosis between myocarditis and myocardial infarction was identical for delayed-enhanced MSCT and MRI with a significant agreement for number of involved segments and transmural extension. Interobserver reproducibility was good for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that delayed-enhanced MSCT allows differentiation between myocardial infarction and myocarditis with the same accuracy at acute phase compared with MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boussel et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Acute chest pain with normal coronary angiogram (n=12). Delayed-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MSCT) vs. Postgadolinium delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Final diagnosis between myocarditis and myocardial infarction, number of involved segments, and transmural extent. Delayed-enhanced MSCT allowed differentiation between myocardial infarction and myocarditis with identical final diagnoses compared to MRI in 12 patients with acute chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: