Key result
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation newly treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran had a significantly greater likelihood of drug switching (HR 1.78 and 3.40, respectively) and discontinuation compared to those treated with apixaban.
Why the study?
Continuous usage of DOACs among NVAF patients is essential to maintain stroke prevention, but switching and discontinuation rates among commonly initiated DOACs required examination.
Does the choice of direct oral anticoagulant (apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran) affect drug switching and discontinuation rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=41,864)
Yes
Does the choice of direct oral anticoagulant (apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran) affect drug switching and discontinuation rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In a real-world US cohort of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, initiation of apixaban was associated with significantly lower rates of drug switching and discontinuation compared to rivaroxaban or dabigatran.
Apixaban was associated with lower switching and discontinuation in nonvalvular AF; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Continuous usage of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is essential to maintain stroke prevention. We examined switching and discontinuation rates for the three most frequently initiated DOACs in NVAF patients in the USA. METHODS: Patients who initiated apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran (index event/date) were identified from the Pharmetrics Plus claims database (Jan 1, 2013-Sep 30, 2016, includes patients with commercial and Medicare coverage) and grouped into cohorts by index DOAC. Patients were required to have a diagnosis of NVAF and continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months prior to the index date (baseline period) and at least 3 months during the follow-up period. Drug switching rates to any other DOAC or warfarin and index DOAC discontinuation rate were evaluated separately with descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the NVAF study population (n = 41,864), 37% initiated apixaban (n = 15,352; mean age 62 years), 51% initiated rivaroxaban (n = 21,250; mean age 61 years), and 13% initiated dabigatran (n = 5262; mean age 61 years). During the follow-up period, the unadjusted drug switching rates of patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran were 3.6%, 6.3%, and 11.1%, respectively (p < 0.001 across the three cohorts); while the index DOAC discontinuation rates were 52.8%, 60.3%, and 62.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). After we controlled for differences in patient characteristics, patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.6-2.0; p < 0.001) and dabigatran (HR 3.4; 95% CI 3.0-3.8, p < 0.001) had a significantly greater likelihood for drug switching than patients treated with apixaban. Also, both rivaroxaban (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.001) and dabigatran (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.3, p < 0.001) treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment. CONCLUSION: In the real-world setting, patients with NVAF newly treated with apixaban were less likely to switch or discontinue treatment compared to patients treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) (n=41,864). Rivaroxaban vs. Apixaban was evaluated on Drug switching to another oral anticoagulant (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.61-1.96, p=<0.001). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation newly treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran had a significantly greater likelihood of drug switching (HR 1.78 and 3.40, respectively) and discontinuation compared to those treated with apixaban.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: