Key result
Midregional pro-Adrenomedullin strongly predicted one-year all-cause mortality independently of NT-proBNP levels (OR 10.46) in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea.
Why the study?
Does the measurement of MR-proADM, alone or combined with natriuretic peptides, improve risk stratification for mortality in patients presenting with acute dyspnea?
Cohort (n=287)
No
Does the measurement of MR-proADM, alone or combined with natriuretic peptides, improve risk stratification for mortality in patients presenting with acute dyspnea?
MR-proADM, alone or in combination with NT-proBNP, provides independent prognostic value for predicting one-year mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid mortality risk stratification in acute dyspnea; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: The identification of patients at highest risk for adverse outcome who are presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department remains a challenge. This study investigates the prognostic value of the newly described midregional fragment of the pro-Adrenomedullin molecule (MR-proADM) alone and combined to B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) in patients with acute dyspnea. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study in the emergency department of a University Hospital and enrolled 287 unselected, consecutive patients (48% women, median age 77 (range 68 to 83) years) with acute dyspnea. RESULTS: MR-proADM levels were elevated in non-survivors (n = 77) compared to survivors (median 1.9 (1.2 to 3.2) nmol/L vs. 1.1 (0.8 to 1.6) nmol/L; P < 0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to predict 30-day mortality were 0.81 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90), 0.76 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.84) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.74) for MR-proADM, NT-proBNP and BNP, respectively (MRproADM vs. NTproBNP P = 0.38; MRproADM vs. BNP P = 0.009). For one-year mortality the AUC were 0.75 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81), 0.75 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.81), 0.69 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.76) for MR-proADM, NT-proBNP and BNP, respectively without any significant difference. Using multivariate linear regression analysis, MR-proADM strongly predicted one-year all-cause mortality independently of NT-proBNP and BNP levels (OR = 10.46 (1.36 to 80.50), P = 0.02 and OR = 24.86 (3.87 to 159.80) P = 0.001, respectively). Using quartile approaches, Kaplan-Meier curve analyses demonstrated a stepwise increase in one-year all-cause mortality with increasing plasma levels (P < 0.0001). Combined levels of MR-proADM and NT-proBNP did risk stratify acute dyspneic patients into a low (90% one-year survival rate), intermediate (72 to 82% one-year survival rate) or high risk group (52% one-year survival rate). CONCLUSIONS: MR-proADM alone or combined to NT-proBNP has a potential to assist clinicians in risk stratifying patients presenting with acute dyspnea regardless of the underlying disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potocki et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Acute dyspnea (n=287). Midregional pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) vs. NT-proBNP and BNP was evaluated on One-year all-cause mortality (OR 10.46, 95% CI 1.36 to 80.50, p=0.02). Midregional pro-Adrenomedullin strongly predicted one-year all-cause mortality independently of NT-proBNP levels (OR 10.46) in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: