Key result
Biomarkers of atrial remodeling and fibrosis, including biochemical, histological, and imaging approaches, are valuable for predicting atrial fibrillation occurrence and treatment outcomes.
Why the study?
What are the validated biochemical, histological, and imaging biomarkers of atrial remodeling and fibrosis in humans?
What are the validated biochemical, histological, and imaging biomarkers of atrial remodeling and fibrosis in humans?
This review highlights the utility of biochemical, histological, and imaging biomarkers in assessing atrial myopathy and predicting atrial fibrillation outcomes.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disturbance encountered in clinical practice. Although often considered as solely arrhythmic in nature, current evidence has established that atrial myopathy constitutes both the substrate and the outcome of atrial fibrillation, thus initiating a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle. This myopathy is triggered by stress-induced (including pressure/volume overload, inflammation, oxidative stress) responses of atrial tissue, which in the long term become maladaptive, and combine elements of both structural, especially fibrosis, and electrical remodeling, with contemporary approaches yielding potentially useful biomarkers of these processes. Biomarker value becomes greater given the fact that they can both predict atrial fibrillation occurrence and treatment outcome. This mini-review will focus on the biomarkers of atrial remodeling (both electrical and structural) and fibrosis that have been validated in human studies, including biochemical, histological and imaging approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dilaveris et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Biomarkers of atrial remodeling and fibrosis was evaluated. Biomarkers of atrial remodeling and fibrosis, including biochemical, histological, and imaging approaches, are valuable for predicting atrial fibrillation occurrence and treatment outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: