Why the study?
Does a simulated 30% relative risk reduction (mimicking ACEi/ARB) reduce the NNT to prevent ESRD in older adults with CKD?
Cohort (n=371,470)
Yes
Does a simulated 30% relative risk reduction (mimicking ACEi/ARB) reduce the NNT to prevent ESRD in older adults with CKD?
Differences in baseline risk and life expectancy between trial subjects and real-world older adults with CKD may substantially reduce the marginal benefit of interventions to prevent ESRD.
NNT varies widely by risk in older CKD adults, warranting individualized assessment; leaves open real-world ESRD benefit of ACEi/ARB.
IMPORTANCE: Older adults are often excluded from clinical trials. The benefit of preventive interventions tested in younger trial populations may be reduced when applied to older adults in the clinical setting if they are less likely to survive long enough to experience those outcomes targeted by the intervention. OBJECTIVE: To extrapolate a treatment effect similar to those reported in major randomized clinical trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for prevention of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to a real-world population of older patients with chronic kidney disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Simulation study in a retrospective cohort conducted in Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. We included 371 470 patients 70 years or older with chronic kidney disease. EXPOSURE: Level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Among members of this cohort, we evaluated the expected effect of a 30% reduction in relative risk on the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 case of ESRD over a 3-year period. These limits were selected to mimic the treatment effect achieved in major trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for prevention of ESRD. These trials have reported relative risk reductions of 23% to 56% during observation periods of 2.6 to 3.4 years, yielding NNTs to prevent 1 case of ESRD of 9 to 25. RESULTS: The NNT to prevent 1 case of ESRD among members of this cohort ranged from 16 in patients with the highest baseline risk (eGFR of 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with a dipstick proteinuria measurement of ≥ 2+) to 2500 for those with the lowest baseline risk (eGFR of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with negative or trace proteinuria and eGFR of ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with dipstick proteinuria measurement of 1+). Most patients belonged to groups with an NNT of more than 100, even when the exposure time was extended over 10 years and in all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Differences in baseline risk and life expectancy between trial subjects and real-world populations of older adults with CKD may reduce the marginal benefit to individual patients of interventions to prevent ESRD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Hare et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (n=371,470). Simulated 30% relative risk reduction (mimicking ACE inhibitors and ARBs) was evaluated on Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 case of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: