Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants may be a potentially useful choice for secondary prevention of cancer-associated stroke, though their application remains controversial due to limited evidence.
Why the study?
The optimal anticoagulant treatment for cancer-associated embolic stroke remains controversial.
Do direct oral anticoagulants prevent thromboembolic events better than warfarin in patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke?
Do direct oral anticoagulants prevent thromboembolic events better than warfarin in patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke?
This review suggests that direct oral anticoagulants may be preferable to warfarin for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke due to their ability to block the coagulation cascade.
May support DOAC consideration over warfarin in cancer stroke; leaves open need for RCTs before any practice shift.
Patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke pose similar clinical manifestations and image characteristics, mainly embolic infarction, as patients with atrial fibrillation do. D-dimer, a degraded product of fibrin polymer, is a useful indicator of hypercoagulability, which frequently increases in cancer-associated stroke, but not in stroke resulted from atrial fibrillation. The level of serum D-dimer is associated with mortality, prognosis, and recurrence of systemic thromboembolism in these patients. Theoretically, drugs block coagulation cascade, such as heparin and low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH), oral direct anticoagulants, could attenuate the status of hypercoagulation and decrease the amount of D-dimer. These drugs may be helpful to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with cancer-associated hypercoagulability. Vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, decreases the production of coagulation factors, but not interrupts coagulation cascade may not be helpful to decrease hypercoagulability, but increase the risk of bleeding. However, the treatment of cancer-associated embolic stroke is still controversial. This article reviews relevant clinical studies and proposes the applicability of direct oral anticoagulants from the pathophysiological mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cancer-associated ischemic stroke. Anticoagulants (Direct oral anticoagulants, LMWH, Warfarin) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants may be a potentially useful choice for secondary prevention of cancer-associated stroke, though their application remains controversial due to limited evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: