Key result
ML model using age, BP, and BMI predicts elevated arterial stiffness in diabetics with ~0.93 AUROC.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk remains high in diabetes, but a machine learning clinical prediction model for elevated arterial stiffness to identify high-risk individuals had not yet been developed.
Can a gradient boosting-based machine learning model using simple clinical variables accurately predict elevated arterial stiffness in patients with diabetes?
Observational (n=1,672)
Yes
Can a gradient boosting-based machine learning model using simple clinical variables accurately predict elevated arterial stiffness in patients with diabetes?
A gradient boosting machine learning model using four simple clinical variables (age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and BMI) can accurately identify elevated arterial stiffness in diabetic patients, facilitating early cardiovascular risk assessment.
May facilitate noninvasive stiffness screening in diabetes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The incidence of cardiovascular events remains high in diabetics. However, a clinical prediction model for elevated arterial stiffness using machine learning to identify subjects consequently at higher risk remains to be developed. Methods Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination were used for feature selection. Four machine learning algorithms were used to construct a prediction model, and their performance was compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metric in a discovery dataset ( n = 760). The model with the best performance was selected and validated in an independent dataset ( n = 912) from the Dryad Digital Repository ( https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m484p ). To apply our model to clinical practice, we built a free and user-friendly web online tool. Results The predictive model includes the predictors: age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index. In the discovery cohort, the gradient boosting-based model outperformed other methods in the elevated arterial stiffness prediction. In the validation cohort, the gradient boosting model showed a good discrimination capacity. A cutoff value of 0.46 for the elevated arterial stiffness risk score in the gradient boosting model resulted in a good specificity (0.813 in the discovery data and 0.761 in the validation data) and sensitivity (0.875 and 0.738, respectively) trade-off points. Conclusion The gradient boosting-based prediction system presents a good classification in elevated arterial stiffness prediction. The web online tool makes our gradient boosting-based model easily accessible for further clinical studies and utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Diabetes Mellitus (n=1,672). Gradient boosting machine learning model was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting elevated arterial stiffness. A gradient boosting machine learning model using age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index accurately predicted elevated arterial stiffness in diabetic patients with an AUROC of 0.928.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: