Key result
rPPG-HiBa outperforms state-of-the-art methods for remote physiological measurement across and within datasets.
Why the study?
Existing remote photoplethysmography methods ignore the long-tail phenomenon of physiological signal data, particularly across multi-domain joint training and physiological labels.
The rPPG-HiBa framework improves remote photoplethysmography performance by mitigating biases caused by domain and physiological label imbalances.
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a promising technique for non-contact physiological signal measurement. It has great potential applications in human health monitoring and emotion analysis. However, existing methods for the rPPG task ignore the long-tail phenomenon of physiological signal data, especially on multi-domain joint training. In addition, we find that the long-tail problem of the physiological label (phys-label) exists in different datasets, and the long-tail problem of some domain exists under the same phys-label. To tackle these problems, we propose a hierarchical balanced framework, to mitigate the bias caused by domain and phys-label imbalance. Specifically, we propose anti-spurious domain center learning tailored to learning domain-balanced embeddings space. Then, we adopt compact-aware continuity regularization to estimate phys-label-wise imbalances and construct continuity between embeddings. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art in cross-dataset and intra-dataset settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/pywin/HiBa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied Remote physiological measurement. rPPG-HiBa (hierarchical balanced framework) vs. State-of-the-art methods was evaluated on Performance in cross-dataset and intra-dataset settings. The proposed hierarchical balanced framework (rPPG-HiBa) outperformed state-of-the-art methods in cross-dataset and intra-dataset settings for remote physiological measurement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: