Venetoclax induced ≥VGPR in 79% of patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis, with significantly higher response rates in high t(11;14) versus low t(11;14) patients (91% vs 33%, p=0.008).
Cohort (n=29)
No
Does venetoclax improve hematologic and organ responses in patients with relapsed/refractory light-chain amyloidosis?
Venetoclax induces rapid and deep hematologic and cardiac responses in relapsed/refractory light-chain amyloidosis, particularly in patients with a high t(11;14) burden.
Few studies have reported that venetoclax, a selective BCL2 inhibitor, has shown promising efficacy in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (RRAL), especially among patients harboring t(11;14). We retrospectively reviewed 29 RRAL patients treated with venetoclax between July 2022 and January 2025. Treatment was given for suboptimal prior response (45%), hematologic progression (38%), or rising involved free light chain not meeting progression criteria (17%). Venetoclax induced rapid and deep responses: 79% achieved very good partial response (VGPR) or complete response (CR), and 52% achieved stringent FLC response. High t(11;14) (> 10%) patients achieved ≥ VGPR in 91% versus 33% in low t(11;14) (p = 0.008). Cardiac responses occurred in 59% of evaluable patients. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, one-year overall survival and event-free survival were 96.6% and 82.6%, respectively; two deaths were due to cardiac progression. Venetoclax was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1-2 adverse events, except one grade 3 leukopenia/neutropenia with grade 3 infection. These results support venetoclax as an effective and safe therapy for RRAL, particularly in t(11;14) patients, and highlight the need for prospective studies to refine patient selection and optimize treatment strategies.
Xiong et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Relapsed/refractory light-chain (AL) amyloidosis (n=29). Venetoclax was evaluated on ≥ VGPR (very good partial response or complete response). Venetoclax induced ≥VGPR in 79% of patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis, with significantly higher response rates in high t(11;14) versus low t(11;14) patients (91% vs 33%, p=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: