BACKGROUND: Little population-based evidence exists about the characteristics of first disclosure of child sexual abuse (CSA), including age and delay. OBJECTIVE: To generate population-based evidence about the age of first disclosure, delay to first disclosure, first recipients, and feelings of support. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The Australian Child Maltreatment Study collected information about CSA victimization from a nationally representative sample of 8503 individuals aged 16 and over. CSA prevalence was 28.5 %. Almost one half of these individuals (45.2 %) had never disclosed their experience of CSA before participating in the survey. Slightly over one half (54.8 %) of these individuals had disclosed before participating, and provided information about the characteristics of their first disclosure. METHODS: We generated national estimates for age of first disclosure, delay to first disclosure, first recipients, and feeling supported, and compared results by gender and age group. RESULTS: Among individuals who disclosed, 70.2 % first disclosed before age 18, comprising more women (73.7 %) than men (60.4 %); and with participants aged 16-24 more likely (81.2 %) than people aged 25-44 (67.8 %) and 45 or more (68.7 %). Among individuals who disclosed, almost half (45.6 %) first disclosed within a year; the median delay was 1 year and the mean delay was 7.1 years. One in 10 people aged 25 or more (11.1 %) delayed more than 20 years. First recipients were typically mothers (30.9 %) and friends (24.9 %). Most people felt supported (79.8 %), especially those aged 16-24 (87.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant trends in CSA disclosure characteristics. Many people first disclose in childhood, often within a year. Yet, many only disclose in adulthood, after a long delay. While disclosure is becoming more common, measures are required to facilitate disclosure and supportive responses. Findings have implications for health, education and legal systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathews et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: