The article substantiates the judgment that in relation to that in relation to the theories of constitutional interpretation in the United States, paradigms constructed according to the type of binary opposition (originalism –the concept of natural law), are clearly insufficient. Therefore, private legal theories, which are theories of constitutional interpretation of the United States, should take into account the basic principles and institutions, doctrines of the branch of Constitutional Law of the United States: the concept of a “living constitution”, the theory of judicial precedent, procedural aspects of Constitutional Law, structuralist theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. G. Berlyavsky (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: