Key result
In silico modeling of combination therapy simulates ~20% greater plaque stability in initially unstable lesions.
Why the study?
Tailoring treatment for individual patients with atherosclerosis to prevent myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke is an unmet need.
Does simulated pharmacotherapy using a patient-calibrated systems biology model improve atherosclerotic plaque stability?
Does simulated pharmacotherapy using a patient-calibrated systems biology model improve atherosclerotic plaque stability?
Proteomics-based systems biology modeling can simulate individualized drug responses for atherosclerotic plaque stabilization, offering a potential tool for precision medicine.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires clinical validation before adoption; leaves open the role of in silico modeling for individualized atherosclerotic therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Guidance for preventing myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke by tailoring treatment for individual patients with atherosclerosis is an unmet need. Such development may be possible with computational modeling. Given the multifactorial biology of atherosclerosis, modeling must be based on complete biological networks that capture protein-protein interactions estimated to drive disease progression. Here, we aimed to develop a clinically relevant scale model of atherosclerosis, calibrate it with individual patient data, and use it to simulate optimized pharmacotherapy for individual patients. APPROACH AND RESULTS: The study used a uniquely constituted plaque proteomic dataset to create a comprehensive systems biology disease model for simulating individualized responses to pharmacotherapy. Plaque tissue was collected from 18 patients with 6735 proteins at two locations per patient. 113 pathways were identified and included in the systems biology model of endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, and the integrated intima, altogether spanning 4411 proteins, demonstrating a range of 39-96% plaque instability. After calibrating the systems biology models for individual patients, we simulated intensive lipid-lowering, anti-inflammatory, and anti-diabetic drugs. We also simulated a combination therapy. Drug response was evaluated as the degree of change in plaque stability, where an improvement was defined as a reduction of plaque instability. In patients with initially unstable lesions, simulated responses varied from high (20%, on combination therapy) to marginal improvement, whereas patients with initially stable plaques showed generally less improvement. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, proteomics-based system biology modeling was shown to simulate drug response based on atherosclerotic plaque instability with a power of 90%, providing a potential strategy for improved personalized management of patients with cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckler et al. (2022) studied Atherosclerosis (n=18). Simulated intensive lipid-lowering, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic drugs, and combination therapy was evaluated on Degree of change in plaque stability. In silico proteomics-based systems biology modeling of combination therapy simulated up to a 20% improvement in plaque stability for patients with initially unstable atherosclerotic lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: