Key result
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy criteria shift from an RV focus to include LV variants and myocardial scar.
Why the study?
Diagnosing arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is challenging without a single gold-standard test, prompting evolving diagnostic criteria over the past 20 years to better capture left ventricular variants and tissue characterization.
This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic criteria for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, highlighting the inclusion of left ventricular variants and CMR findings in the latest 2023 European criteria.
May aid recognition of left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; leaves open outcome validation of 2023 criteria.
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a cardiac disorder characterized by non-ischemic myocardial scarring, which may lead to ventricular electrical instability and systolic dysfunction. Diagnosing ACM is challenging as there is no single gold-standard test and a combination of criteria is required. The first diagnostic criteria were established in 1994 and revised in 2010, focusing primarily on right ventricular involvement. However, in 2019, an international expert report identified limitations of previous diagnostic scoring and developed the 2020 Padua criteria with also included criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular variants and introduced cardiac magnetic resonance tissue characterization findings for detection of left ventricular myocardial scar. These criteria were further refined and published in 2023 as the European Task Force criteria, gaining international recognition. This review provides an overview of the 20 years of progresses on the disease diagnostic from the original 1994 criteria to the most recent 2023 European criteria, highlighting the evolution into our understanding of the pathobiology and morpho-functional features of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graziano et al. (2024) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Diagnostic criteria for Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy was evaluated. The evolution of diagnostic criteria for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy over 20 years highlights the shift from a right ventricular focus to including left ventricular variants and myocardial scar.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: