PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics0 citationsOpen Access

Café Scout: development and pilot evaluation of a real-time tool for assessing and planning improvements to the healthiness of foodservice environments

View Full Paper
BBBettina BackmanMCMeaghan ChristianCRChanel Relf

Key Points

  • This research aimed to adapt a tool to assess the healthiness of foodservice environments and evaluate its validity and reliability.
  • Developed 'Café Scout' through two stages including initial prototype development and pilot testing.
  • Conducted testing with 27 foodservice outlets and a diverse group of 23 testers in Victoria, Australia.
  • Used Gwet's Agreement Coefficient for reliability, Pearson correlation for construct validity, and collected user feedback.
  • Achieved good interrater reliability with a mean Gwet's Agreement Coefficient of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76).
  • Found a strong alignment (r=0.70, p<0.001) between tool scores and the healthiness of available products.
  • User feedback indicated the tool effectively supports healthy changes in foodservice environments.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-based foodservice outlets (e.g., cafés in sporting centres or healthcare settings) have the potential to support population health, but currently these outlets predominantly encourage less healthy food purchases. No tools exist to rapidly assess the healthiness of the in-store food environments in foodservice outlets from the '4Ps of marketing' perspective (product, placement, price, and promotion) while providing real-time feedback to support the planning and implementation of healthy changes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to adapt the 'Store Scout App', originally developed for grocery stores, to assess the healthiness of in-store food environments in Australian foodservice outlets, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the new tool. DESIGN: A two-stage approach was used to develop 'Café Scout': (1) tool development (convening a working group, identifying tool requirements, and developing an initial prototype; February 2022 -February 2023); and (2) tool refinement and validity evaluation (pilot testing - "Round 1", tool updates, training development, and extended testing - "Round 2"; February 2023 - December 2023). PARTICIPANTS: /setting: Tool testers included health promotion or local government officers (n=12), food outlet managers (n=3), researchers (n=3), and university nutrition placement students (n=5), all based in Victoria, Australia. The tool was tested across 27 foodservice outlets in community-based sporting centres in regional and metropolitan areas of Victoria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater reliability, validity (construct, concurrent criterion and face validity), and usability were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Gwet's Agreement Coefficient were used to assess interrater reliability, Pearson correlation to assess construct and concurrent validity, and descriptive analysis to assess face validity and usability based on user feedback. RESULTS: 'Café Scout' with up to 278 Yes/No questions was developed to assess food outlet marketing practices across eight food and drink product categories. Evaluation showed good interrater reliability (mean Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 0.70 95% CI: 0.64-0.76), strong alignment between tool scores and product healthiness (e.g., total score versus healthiest product availability, r=0.70, p<0.001), and moderate alignment between tool scores and the healthiness of customer drink purchases (e.g., mean drink score versus healthiest drink purchases, r=0.60, p=0.01). User feedback (n=13 surveys) highlighted the tool's value in supporting healthy changes. CONCLUSIONS: Café Scout can rapidly assess the in-store food environments and provide real-time feedback, facilitating the continuous monitoring and planning of healthy changes in foodservice outlets to support healthier food choices and population health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Backman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153790b5d9c58d83e8bf06https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2026.156386
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper