Correction: Comparative clinical outcomes of full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion, biportal endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

May 22, 2026Frontiers in SurgeryOpen Access

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This research aims to compare clinical outcomes among different lumbar interbody fusion techniques for treating degenerative diseases.
Compared full-endoscopic, biportal endoscopic, and conventional lumbar interbody fusion techniques.
Analyzed clinical outcomes including pain relief and mobility.
Study design for robust comparisons.
Full-endoscopic fusion showed a significant reduction in recovery time compared to conventional methods (95% CI 1.2-1.5, p=0.02).
Biportal endoscopic fusion exhibited similar effectiveness to full-endoscopic but required shorter hospital stays.
Conventional fusion had higher complication rates than both endoscopic techniques.

Compares outcomes of different lumbar fusion techniques, suggesting best options for degenerative diseases.

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share