Shows PIP1/2 peptides inhibit growth in Arabidopsis plants, indicating a trade-off between growth and immune response.
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) activate plant immunity through plasma membrane-localized receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like proteins. The PAMP flg22 binds FLAGELLIN SENSING 2 (FLS2), inducing the expression of defense-related genes, including PAMP-INDUCED PEPTIDEs (PIPs), which enhance pathogen resistance via RLK7. However, the mechanisms underlying PAMP- and PIP-mediated growth-defense trade-off remain unclear. Here, we show that PIP1 and PIP2 suppress lateral root (LR) development and seedling growth through the RLK7-MPK3/6-LEAFY PETIOLE (LEP) signaling cascade, with LEP acting as a key node inhibiting LR formation and seedling growth. Exogenous application of PIP1/2 peptides and overexpression of prePIP1and prePIP2 inhibited LR development, while mutations in prePIP1 or prePIP2 enhanced primary root growth and accelerated LR kinetics. Genetic analyses, coimmunoprecipitation, peptide-binding and kinase assays, rapamycin-induced dimerization, and a BIR3 chimera system collectively revealed that PIP1/2 recognition promoted RLK7 interaction with SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE coreceptors, triggering MPK3/6-dependent phosphorylation events that inhibit LR development. The transcription factor LEP acted downstream of the RLK7-MPK6, inhibiting LR development. Loss of LEP function alleviated PIP-induced inhibition of seedling growth and LR formation without compromising immune responses. These findings suggest that PIP1/2 mediate the trade-off between growth and defense via the RLK7-MPK6-LEP signaling axis. The flg22 peptide suppressed LR formation and seedling growth in part through the PIP1/2-RLK7-MPK6-LEP signaling pathway bifurcating from immune responses downstream of MPK3/6. This study established a genetic framework for optimizing crop resilience by decoupling immune activation from growth suppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: