PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2002Circulation646 citations

Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

View Full Paper
DBDietmar BänschElectrophysiologyMAMatthias AntzElectrophysiologySBSigrid BoczorUniversität Hamburg

Key Result

Prophylactic ICD implantation did not significantly improve survival compared to control in patients with recent-onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (1-year mortality 8.0% vs 3.7%).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=104)

Structured PICO

Does prophylactic ICD implantation reduce all-cause mortality in patients with recent onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and LVEF ≤ 30%?

P
Population
104 patients with recent onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (≤ 9 months) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%.
I
Intervention
Implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
C
Comparator
Control group
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality at 1 year of follow-uphard clinical

Prophylactic ICD implantation does not significantly improve survival in patients with recent-onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 3.7%

Limitations

  • The trial was terminated early because the all-cause mortality rate at 1 year did not reach the expected 30% in the control group.
  • Trial was terminated early after the inclusion of 104 patients because the all-cause mortality rate at 1 year did not reach the expected 30% in the control group

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction have an increased risk of dying suddenly. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with recent onset of DCM (< or =9 months) and an ejection fraction < or =30% were randomly assigned to the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or control. The primary end point of the trial was all-cause mortality at 1 year of follow-up. The trial was terminated after the inclusion of 104 patients because the all-cause mortality rate at 1 year did not reach the expected 30% in the control group. In August 2000, the vital status of all patients was updated by contacting patients, relatives, or local registration offices. One hundred four patients were enrolled in the trial: Fifty were assigned to ICD therapy and 54 to the control group. Mean follow-up was 22.8+/-4.3 months, on the basis of investigators' follow-up. After 1 year, 6 patients were dead (4 in the ICD group and 2 in the control group). No sudden death occurred during the first and second years of follow-up. In August 2000, after a mean follow-up of 5.5+/-2.2 years, 30 deaths had occurred (13 in the ICD group and 17 in the control group). Cumulative survival was not significantly different between the two groups (93% and 80% in the control group versus 92% and 86% in the ICD group after 2 and 4 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not provide evidence in favor of prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with DCM of recent onset and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bänsch et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n=104). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vs. Control was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 1 year of follow-up. Prophylactic ICD implantation did not significantly improve survival compared to control in patients with recent-onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (1-year mortality 8.0% vs 3.7%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15384d814bf8ec9a4e417chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000012350.99718.ad
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper