Key result
Lattice-tip PFA achieves 100% acute block with less esophageal and phrenic nerve injury than RFA.
Why the study?
One-shot PFA catheters do not permit flexible lesion sets, prompting evaluation of a novel lattice-tip catheter designed for focal RFA or PFA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for lattice-tip PFA; randomized trials needed before clinical adoption over RFA.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy that may provide safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation (RFA). One-shot PFA catheters have been developed for pulmonary vein isolation, but they do not permit flexible lesion sets. This study investigated a novel lattice-tip catheter designed for focal RFA or PFA ablation. METHODS: The effects of PFA (biphasic, 24 amperes) were investigated in 25 swine using a lattice-tip catheter and system (Affera Inc). Step 1 (n=14) examined the feasibility to create atrial line of block and described its acute effects on the phrenic nerve and esophagus. Step 2 (n=7) examined the subacute effects of PFA on block durability, phrenic nerve, and esophagus ≥2 weeks. Step 3 compared the effects of PFA and RFA on the esophagus using a mechanical deviation model approximating the esophagus to the right atrium (n=4) and by direct ablation within its lumen (n=4). The effects of endocardial PFA and RFA on the phrenic nerve were also compared (n=10). Histological analysis was performed. RESULTS: PFA produced acute block in 100% of lines, achieved with 2.1 (1.3-3.2) applications/cm line. Histological analysis following (35 [18-37]) days showed 100% transmurality (thickness range 0.4-3.4 mm) with a lesion width of 19.4 (10.9-27.4 mm). PFA selectively affected cardiomyocytes but spared blood vessels and nervous tissue. PFA applied from the posterior atria (23 [21-25] applications) to the approximated esophagus (6 [4.5-14] mm) produced transmural lesions without esophageal injury. PFA (16.5 [15-18] applications) applied inside the esophageal lumen produced mild edema compared with RFA (13 [12-14] applications) which produced epithelial ulcerations. PFA resulted in no or transient stunning of the phrenic nerve (<5 minutes) without histological changes while RFA produced paralysis. CONCLUSIONS: PFA using a lattice-tip ablation catheter for focal ablation produced durable atrial lesions and showed lower vulnerability to esophageal or phrenic nerve damage compared with RFA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavin et al. (2020) studied Atrial ablation (swine model) (n=25). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a lattice-tip catheter vs. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was evaluated on Acute atrial line of block. Pulsed field ablation using a lattice-tip catheter produced durable atrial lesions with 100% acute block and showed lower vulnerability to esophageal or phrenic nerve damage compared with RFA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: