Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coiling remains a widely used, first-line endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. However, recent large-scale evaluations are limited since the ARETA study, which assessed the safety and efficacy of aneurysm coiling in patients treated between 2013 - 2015. A detailed analysis of the INSTANT study is presented, which provides recent data on endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the OPTIMA™ coil system (Balt). MATERIALS AND METHODS: INSTANT is a European, non-interventional, prospective study that assessed patients with ruptured, unruptured, or recanalized aneurysms treated with OPTIMA™. The primary endpoint was the morbi-mortality of patients treated with OPTIMA™ at 30 days, with an additional assessment at 12 months as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: From April 2019 to September 2022, 294 patients (56.3±12.0 years, 186 women [63.3%]) were enrolled in 18 European centers. Aneurysms were acutely ruptured in 45.2% of cases (N=133/294) and unruptured/recanalized in 54.8% (N=161/294). The overall mortality at 30 days was 0.0% in patients with unruptured aneurysms and 3.0% (N=4/133, [95% CI:0.1-5.9]) in those with ruptured aneurysms, which were all related to SAH and its complications. Overall, morbidity at 30 days was 1.2% (N=2/161, [95% CI:0.0-3.0]) in patients with unruptured aneurysms and 21.1% (N=28/133, [95% CI:14.1-28.0]) in patients with ruptured aneurysms. No deaths or adverse events resulting in morbidity were related to OPTIMA™ or the procedure (0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In the INSTANT study, treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the OPTIMA™ coil system showed low morbidity and mortality at 30 days and 12 months, unrelated to the device or procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierot et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: