Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates rapid polyethylene microplastic detection in seawater and seafood, suggesting effective monitoring methods.
Polyethylene (PE) microplastics are increasingly recognized as a critical environmental and food-safety concern; however, routine monitoring remains limited by conventional methods that are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and difficult to translate into rapid, on-site screening. Here, we report a machine learning-guided electrochemical fingerprinting platform for rapid PE microplastic detection using a chitosan–PE interfacial film coupled with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and coulometry. The platform generated concentration-dependent electrical fingerprints in artificial ocean water, captured through Bode, Nyquist, and charge–time responses. Quantification was achieved across 1–256 ng/mL with strong linearity (R2 = 0.976) and an ultralow LoD of 0.1 ng/mL, demonstrating high analytical sensitivity. Practical applicability was validated through spike–recovery in ocean water (R2 = 0.967) and shrimp-derived matrices with matrix-matched normalization, yielding recoveries of 90–105% across low, mid, and high spike levels. Under the tested particle set, PE produced stronger responses than non-target polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS), supporting empirical polymer discrimination. Machine learning classification using impedance-derived features achieved an AUC = 0.98, with 100% correct identification of Low and 95.24% correct identification of High samples. Overall, this electrochemical–ML framework enables rapid, sensitive, and matrix-tolerant PE microplastic screening in environmental water and seafood-related matrices, offering a promising pathway toward portable microplastic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: