T75 develops a model-dependent prediction for the observable Q5 fringe-bias scale arising from leakage into hidden quarter-phase transport classes. Using the weight parameterization₀=1-, ₁=₁, ₂=₂, ₃=₃, \₁+₂+₃=1, theorem derives the exact bias relation\²= (+₂) ²+ (₃-₁) ². resulting fringe bias is therefore controlled not only by total leakage magnitude but also by the structure of the leakage distribution across the quarter-phase classes. The cosine-sector deviation arises from the overall leakage displacement term \ ( (+₂) \), while the sine-sector deviation is governed by the antisymmetric imbalance mode \ ( (₃-₁) \). T75 is structurally important because it converts the earlier qualitative leakage architecture into a quantitative interferometric prediction. Under the Q5 suppression estimates inherited from T57, the theorem predicts a characteristic fringe-bias scale\ₐ₅10^-4 single-bridge leakage, and\ₐ₅10^-7 an additional return-mediated suppression layer. The theorem, therefore, supplies the missing magnitude estimate needed to complete the experimental prediction arc developed through T72-T74: signal form, structural discriminator, detection threshold, and expected signal scale. T75 does not claim a universal numerical prediction or guaranteed observability across interferometer designs. The predicted magnitude depends on the leakage-path architecture, the symmetry properties of the leakage distribution, and the mapping between the structural suppression parameter \ (\) and experimentally accessible optical leakage modes. The resulting prediction is therefore conditional rather than uniquely derived. Status: solid for the exact leakage-weight decomposition\²= (+₂) ²+ (₃-₁) ² for the associated order-of-magnitude scaling analysis under the stated assumptions; conditional on the leakage-path architecture, symmetry structure, and suppression mapping inherited from T57; speculative for the existence or observability of any physical Q5 fringe residual prior to experimental detection.
Craig Edwin Holdway (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: