Comparative study demonstrates effective transformation methods for bounded applications, enhancing data utilization.
This study presents four transformation methods: Inverse exponential, arctangent, rational, and reciprocal for converting unbounded probability distributions into bounded forms defined over the interval (0, 1). These methods are applied to the new XLindley distribution, a flexible model whose unbounded nature limits its applicability to enhance its utility in a bounded domain (0, 1). A comprehensive comparison assesses the effectiveness of each transformation through five important dimensions as follows: Monotonicity, mathematical properties including moments, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy, parameter estimation methods with a focus on maximum likelihood estimation and the method of Anderson-Darling, numerical simulation performance assessing convergence and stability, and practical applications as demonstrated by three real-world datasets. The results highlight each method’s weaknesses as well as strengths, with one transformation outperforming the others in terms of flexibility, estimation accuracy, and practical adaptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Bar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: