Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report demonstrates a novel prosthetic design enhancing stability and function in maxillary defect rehabilitation.
Context: Prosthetic rehabilitation of acquired maxillary defects with Maxillary Resection Prostheses (MRPs) remains biomechanically challenging, particularly in partially edentulous patients, where conventional clasp-retained designs often yield suboptimal retention, stability, and functional outcomes. Research Gap: The integration of telescopic crown systems with semi-precision attachments incorporating a rotational latching mechanism has not been previously described as a unified approach to optimise load distribution and prosthesis stability in maxillary defect rehabilitation. Objective: To describe and clinically evaluate a novel prosthetic design combining telescopic crowns and a semi-precision rotational latching attachment to enhance retention, stability, and functional performance of MRPs. Methodology: A 31-year-old patient with a unilateral maxillary defect following partial maxillectomy presented with an unstable interim prosthesis and impaired speech and mastication. A definitive MRP was designed using telescopic crowns on the remaining dentition to establish a controlled path of insertion and improved axial load transfer. A semi-precision attachment with a key–keyway rotational latching mechanism was incorporated into the secondary framework to engage specific undercuts while minimising lateral forces on abutment teeth. A provisional prosthesis was used for 3 months to evaluate base extension, phonetics, and functional parameters before fabrication of the definitive prosthesis. Results: Serial follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months demonstrate consistent prosthesis stability, precise seating, and favourable retention. Marked improvements were observed in speech intelligibility, masticatory efficiency, and patient-reported comfort. Conclusions: This combined prosthetic strategy represents a novel and biomechanically optimised approach for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous maxillary defects, with promising clinical and functional outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzidou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: