Key result
Intramural basal inferior septum VAs require stepwise ablation targeting early exits for procedural success.
Why the study?
Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the intramural basal inferior septum have not been specifically addressed to date.
Does stepwise catheter ablation improve procedural success in patients with intramural basal inferior septum ventricular arrhythmias?
Observational (n=55)
Does stepwise catheter ablation improve procedural success in patients with intramural basal inferior septum ventricular arrhythmias?
Intramural ventricular arrhythmias originating from the basal inferior septum can be distinguished by local activation time and pacing mapping, and successfully treated using a stepwise ablation approach.
Stepwise ablation may aid intramural basal inferior septum arrhythmias; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: The electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) arising from the intramural basal inferior septum (BIS) have not been specifically addressed to date. The aim of the current study was to characterize intramural BIS-VA and distinguish it from those with endocardial origins besides clarifying the anatomical configurations of the pyramidal space. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of VAs from BIS were identified and divided into three groups: the left ventricular (LV)-BIS group (n = 28), right ventricular (RV)-BIS group (n = 8), and intramural group (Intra, n = 19). Compared with the LV-BIS and RV-BIS groups, patients in the Intra group presented with no adequate earliest activation time at the two-sided BIS and epicardial coronary system [right: 7.79 ± 2.38 vs. left: 7.16 ± 2.59 vs. the middle cardiac vein (MCV): 6.26 ± 1.73 ms, P = 0.173] and poor-matched pacing-produced QRS at each site. Under the intracardiac echocardiography view, the pyramidal base was the broadest part of the septum and served as the division of the two-sided BIS. Focal ablation yielded promising acute-term and long-term procedural success in the LV-BIS and RV-BIS groups. But for the Intra group, VAs disappeared only after stepwise ablation successively targeted early preferential exit. After follow-up, three patients in the Intra group had recurrent VA, and all of them were treated well by a redo procedure or drug therapy. CONCLUSION: Intramural VAs were relatively common in the BIS region in our series. Intra-procedural mapping was important to distinguish the intramural VAs from other VAs by comparing the local activation time and pacing mapping. Procedural success could be achieved by stepwise ablation on the counterpart sides of the BIS and within the MCV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Ventricular arrhythmias originating from the basal inferior septum (n=55). Catheter ablation vs. LV-BIS and RV-BIS origins was evaluated on Earliest activation time at the two-sided BIS and epicardial coronary system (p=0.173). Intramural ventricular arrhythmias from the basal inferior septum required stepwise ablation targeting early preferential exits for procedural success, unlike focal ablation for endocardial origins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: