Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scholars have recognized the importance of commercial news media in disseminating diversified information to challenge state censorship. However, these observations fail to explain adequately how and why the authoritarian regime in China is able to strengthen its capacity to control information even after information flourished dramatically since the 1990s. From a state perspective, I argue that besides disseminating information, commercialization also differentiates informational and state–media conflict, which transforms the previous single-dimensional state–media regime into a three-dimensional one. During this process, the development of the court system and the labor market have played a significant role in shaping state–media dynamics and offer the state the structural resilience to survive these information challenges. The implications of the new state–media regime are further discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fen Lin (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: