Why the study?
Does the intraaortic phase-shift balloon pump improve outcomes in patients with medically refractory cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction?
Does the intraaortic phase-shift balloon pump improve outcomes in patients with medically refractory cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction?
This early report introduces the clinical trial and initial evaluation of intraaortic phase-shift balloon pumping for medically refractory cardiogenic shock.
Provides first RCT evaluation of IABP for refractory cardiogenic shock; establishes new direction beyond pharmacotherapy.
Pump failure is considered to be the primary pathophysiologic defect in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction. Several investigators have reported mortality in 85% to 95% of patients with this syndrome.¹⁻⁴In those with cardiogenic shock accompanied by pulmonary edema, the fatality rate was 100% in a series of 241 patients with acute myocardial infarction studied by E. Greif, according to an oral communication with him on Oct 28, 1968. Available pharmacologic therapies which augment myocardial contractility or raise systemic blood pressure also increase the internal work of the heart and, therewith, its oxygen demand. Use of these agents does not appear to be associated with an increased survival rate. Since June 1967 a mechanical means of circulatory support for patients in refractory cardiogenic shock, the intraaortic phase-shift balloon pump, has been under clinical trial. Our experimental laboratory studies and initial clinical evaluation indicated that balloon pumping effectively
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ádrian Kantrowitz (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: