Key result
Including trabeculae and papillary muscles in LV volumetry allows 100% distinction of peak filling rates.
Why the study?
The study investigated the impact of trabeculae and papillary muscles on CMR diastolic function parameters derived from time-volume curves.
Does inclusion of trabeculae and papillary muscles into the myocardium improve the precision of diastolic function parameter assessment in healthy volunteers compared to inclusion into the blood pool?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does inclusion of trabeculae and papillary muscles into the myocardium improve the precision of diastolic function parameter assessment in healthy volunteers compared to inclusion into the blood pool?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 36%
Inclusion of trabeculae and papillary muscles into the myocardium during CMR LV volumetry allows for more precise and standardized determination of diastolic function parameters compared to inclusion into the blood pool.
May improve diastolic parameter standardization on CMR volumetry; leaves open validation in patients and clinical impact.
Background This cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) study investigates the impact of trabeculae and papillary muscles (TPM) on diastolic function parameters by differentiation of the time-volume curve. Differentiation causes additional problems, which is overcome by standardization. Methods Cine steady-state free-precession imaging at 1.5 T was performed in 40 healthy volunteers stratified for age (age range 7–78y). LV time-volume curves were assessed by software-assisted delineation of endocardial contours from short axis slices applying two different methods: (1) inclusion of TPM into the myocardium and (2) inclusion of TPM into the LV cavity blood volume. Diastolic function was assessed from the differentiated time-volume curves defining the early and atrial peaks, their filling rates, filling volumes, and further dedicated diastolic measures, respectively. Results Only inclusion of TPM into the myocardium allowed precise assessment of early and atrial peak filling rates (EPFR, APFR) with clear distinction of EPFR and APFR expressed by the minimum between the early and atrial peak (EA min ) (100% vs. 36% for EA min < 0.8). Prediction of peak filling rate ratios (PFRR) and filling volume ratios (FVR) by age was superior with inclusion of TPM into the myocardium compared to inclusion into the blood pool ( r 2 = 0.85 vs. r 2 = 0.56 and r 2 = 0.89 vs. r 2 = 0.66). Standardization problems were overcome by the introduction of a third phase (mid-diastole, apart from diastole and systole) and fitting of the early and atrial peaks in the differentiated time-volume curve. Conclusions Only LV volumetry with inclusion of TPM into the myocardium allows precise determination of diastolic measures and prevents methodological artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoennagel et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=40). LV volumetry with inclusion of TPM into the myocardium vs. LV volumetry with inclusion of TPM into the blood pool was evaluated on Clear distinction of early and atrial peak filling rates (EAmin < 0.8). Including trabeculae and papillary muscles into the myocardium during LV volumetry allowed clear distinction of early and atrial peak filling rates in 100% of subjects vs 36% when in the blood pool.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: