Key result
Higher training impulse during interval training correlates with dose-dependent SBP reductions in male adolescents.
Why the study?
Application of the training impulse (TRIMP) method in school-based health programs is limited, and dose-response relationships with health outcomes in adolescents required examination.
Does higher training impulse (TRIMP) improve body fat percentage, blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents undergoing interval-based training?
Cohort (n=145)
Does higher training impulse (TRIMP) improve body fat percentage, blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents undergoing interval-based training?
TRIMP is a feasible tool for quantifying internal training load in adolescents, with higher TRIMP values correlating with reductions in blood pressure and body fat percentage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TRIMP may guide interval training intensity for adolescent BP control; extends observational dose-response evidence but requires RCTs to confirm causality.
Background: The training impulse (TRIMP) method integrates exercise duration and intensity, yet its application in school-based health programs is limited. This study examined dose–response relationships between TRIMP and changes in body fat percentage (%BF), blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents. Methods: 145 adolescents (69 males, 76 females; aged 15.01 ± 0.54 years) completed eight-week interval-based physical education programs: high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or high-intensity plyometric training (HIPT). Heart rate was continuously monitored, and TRIMP values were calculated across 16 sessions. Outcomes included %BF, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: HIIT elicited higher TRIMP than HIPT in females (η2p = 0.043). Linear dose–response patterns were identified (r = 0.18–0.36) (e.g., SBP in males, r = −0.38, p = 0.001; %BF in males, r = −0.36, p = 0.002). In males, one TRIMP unit reduced SBP by 1.8 mmHg (HIIT) and DBP by 1.6 mmHg (HIPT). In females, HIPT-derived TRIMP predicted reductions of ~0.6% in %BF and~0.9 mmHg in DBP. No significant associations were found for VO2max. Conclusions: TRIMP provides a feasible and sensitive tool for quantifying internal training load in adolescent interventions, linking exercise dose to measurable health benefits and supporting its application in preventive contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domaradzki et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Healthy adolescents (n=145). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and high-intensity plyometric training (HIPT) vs. Dose-response (TRIMP values) was evaluated on Dose-response relationships between TRIMP and changes in body fat percentage, blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness (r = -0.38, p=0.001). Training impulse (TRIMP) during 8-week interval-based interventions demonstrated linear dose-response relationships with reductions in systolic blood pressure (r=-0.38, p=0.001) in male adolescents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: