A beneficial reform may be blocked by a majority if it is implemented by a big bang but the same reform may succeed with an optimally designed gradualist approach. A gradualist approach can sometimes split opposition force and is, in this sense, more politically sustainable. On the other hand, if both approaches are politically preferred to no reform, a big bang is often preferred to gradualism in terms of both political support as well as economic efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang‐Jin Wei (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: