Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking evaluation reveals performance limitations of existing quality models on wide-angle video datasets, highlighting the need for specialized assessment frameworks.
Wide-angle video is favored for its wide viewing angle and ability to capture a large area of scenery, making it an ideal choice for sports and adventure recording. However, wide-angle video is prone to deformation, exposure and other distortions, resulting in poor video quality and affecting the perception and experience, which may seriously hinder its application in fields such as competitive sports. Up to now, few explorations focus on the quality assessment issue of wide-angle video. This deficiency primarily stems from the absence of a specialized dataset for wide-angle videos. To bridge this gap, we construct the first Multi-annotated and multi-modal Wide-angle Video quality assessment (MWV) dataset. Then, the performances of state-of-the-art video quality methods on the MWV dataset are investigated by inter-dataset testing and intra-dataset testing. Experimental results show that these methods impose significant limitations on their applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: