Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Starting with its presentation by Ubiritan D’Ambrosio, ethnomathematics has been a prominent sub field of mathematics education research. In this paper, I will first discuss how different researchers, who study ethnomathematics, define it. Second, I will summarize the ideas, philosophies and stances ethnomathematicians share. I will then critique the thesis presupposing mathematics is culturally dependent, which is shared by most researchers studying ethnomathematics. I will name this thesis as the Cultural Relativity Thesis (CRT). My counter thesis to CRT that I name as Culturally Independence Thesis (CIT), presupposing the cultural independency and universality of mathematics, will be detailed in four aspects: etymological, socio-pedagogical, historical-anthropological and in terms of the universal applicability of mathematics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osman Çimen (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: