Key result
Good epicardial perfusion assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography predicted significantly greater recovery of LVEF at 6 months compared to poor perfusion (63.8% vs 47.0%, p=0.04).
Why the study?
Does the transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography predict long-term recovery of left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=20)
Does the transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography predict long-term recovery of left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction?
Assessing transmural myocardial perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography on day 15 can predict the long-term recovery of left ventricular function at 6 months after reperfused anterior AMI.
BACKGROUND: The transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion is important for predicting the contractile reverse of an infarcted wall in reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Evaluating transmural myocardial perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) could predict the long-term recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group comprised 20 consecutive patients with a first-episode anterior AMI with total occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery, who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h of onset. MCE was performed on the 15th day after the onset, using ultraharmonic gray-scale imaging with intermittent end-systolic triggering every 4 beats or every 6 beats. Regions of interest were placed over both the endocardial and epicardial region at the mid-septal level. Regional wall motion (RWM) of the infarcted anterior wall and global LV function were assessed by 2-dimensional echocardiography and left ventriculography in both the acute and chronic phase. The transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion by MCE demonstrated a significant relation with RWM score index (r = 0.75, p = 0.0004). Recovery of RWM and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months after reperfusion was significantly greater in the group with good perfusion of the epicardium according to MCE than in the poor perfusion group [RWM (SD/cord); -1.23+/-0.91 vs -3.51+/-0.84, p = 0.001, LVEF (%); 63.8+/-10.4 vs 47.0+/-3.4, p = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion by MCE can predict the long-term recovery of LV function after a reperfused AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wada et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=20). Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) showing good epicardial perfusion vs. Poor epicardial perfusion on MCE was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months (p=0.04). Good epicardial perfusion assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography predicted significantly greater recovery of LVEF at 6 months compared to poor perfusion (63.8% vs 47.0%, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: