This paper provides a critical review of studies using neurophysiological measures in tourism and hospitality. Among 145 articles covering 20 years of research, 16 studies applied either electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), or skin conductance (SC) measures in tourism and hospitality settings. Results show that, in general, (1) EEG studies investigated the relationships between EEG components and attention/emotion induced by destination advertisements; (2) fMRI studies examined the correlation between brain area activation and behavior (e.g., visit intention); and (3) SC studies focused on emotional responses to tourism stimuli. Neurophysiological techniques are theoretically and practically useful in tourism and hospitality: these tools uncover subjects’ objective, unbiased, and real-time responses to provide academic insight and guide industry practitioners’ decisions. Directions for future research are proposed along with solutions to address the current limitations of neuroscience measures in tourism and hospitality applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: