Key result
Lesion length was significantly inversely correlated with FFR in intermediate coronary lesions (r = -0.79, P < 0.0001), with a length >16.1 mm best predicting an FFR <0.80.
Why the study?
Does lesion length predict functional significance (FFR <0.80) better than percent diameter stenosis in intermediate coronary lesions?
Observational (n=136)
Does lesion length predict functional significance (FFR <0.80) better than percent diameter stenosis in intermediate coronary lesions?
Effect estimate: r = -0.79
p-value: p=<0.0001
In intermediate coronary lesions (40-70% stenosis), lesion length >16.1 mm is a strong predictor of functional significance (FFR <0.80), whereas percent diameter stenosis is not.
Lesion length >16.1 mm was associated with FFR <0.80; leaves open whether it outperforms diameter stenosis in prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is useful in the evaluation of coronary lesion ischemia. However, the impact of lesion length on FFR has not been adequately assessed. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that lesion length would influence functional significance in intermediate coronary lesions. METHODS: FFR measurements were assessed in 136 patients (163 lesions) with stable angina who had >40% stenotic coronary lesion by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). One hundred sixty-three lesions were classified as intermediate (40%-70% stenosis; n=107; group I) or significant (≥70%; n=56; group S) by QCA. We assessed the relationships between lesion length, coronary stenosis, and FFR in these 163 lesions. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) and FFR in group S (r = -0.83, P < 0.0001). In group I, no significant correlation was found between %DS and FFR (r = -0.06, P = 0.55), whereas lesion length was significantly inversely correlated with FFR (r = -0.79, P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the best cutoff value for predicting an FFR value <0.80 was a lesion length >16.1 mm in group I (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 94%). CONCLUSIONS: These study findings suggest that lesion length has a physiologically significant impact on intermediate-grade coronary lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iguchi et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Stable angina with >40% stenotic coronary lesion (n=136). Lesion length assessment was evaluated on Correlation between lesion length and FFR in intermediate coronary lesions (r = -0.79, p=<0.0001). Lesion length was significantly inversely correlated with FFR in intermediate coronary lesions (r = -0.79, P < 0.0001), with a length >16.1 mm best predicting an FFR <0.80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: