Key result
Women undergoing newer-generation TAVR show ~60% higher short-term mortality than men but similar 1-year survival.
Why the study?
Data regarding sex-specific differences in outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with newer-generation valves were limited.
Does female sex affect mortality and complications in patients undergoing TAVR with newer generation devices?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,522)
Does female sex affect mortality and complications in patients undergoing TAVR with newer generation devices?
Women undergoing TAVR with newer-generation devices have higher short-term mortality but similar 1-year mortality compared to men.
Women may warrant closer short-term monitoring after TAVR; extends sex-difference data with newer devices but leaves open need for targeted strategies.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a reasonable therapeutic approach among patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis irrespective of surgical risk. Data regarding sex-specific differences in the outcomes with newer generation valves are limited. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing sex differences in the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with newer generation valves (SAPIEN 3 or Evolut). Random effects model was constructed for summary estimates. RESULTS: Four observational studies with 4522 patients (44.8% women) were included in the meta-analysis. Women were older and had a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease and mean EuroScore. Women had a higher incidence of short-term mortality (up to 30 days) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.25), but no difference in 1-year mortality (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.17). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.86-1.57), permanent pacemaker (PPM) (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-1.04), or disabling stroke (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.54-2.45). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, we found that women undergoing TAVR with newer-generation devices were older but had a lower prevalence of comorbidities. Women had a higher incidence of short-term mortality but no difference in the 1-year mortality, bleeding, PPM, or stroke compared with men. Future studies are required to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherbini et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=4,522). Female sex (TAVR in women) vs. Male sex (TAVR in men) was evaluated on Short-term mortality (up to 30 days) (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.25). Women undergoing TAVR with newer-generation devices had a higher incidence of short-term mortality compared to men (RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.14-2.25), but no difference in 1-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: