Key result
Dual-energy lattice-tip catheter yields similar same-day discharge rates compared to conventional RF ablation.
Why the study?
Same day discharge after AF ablation is generally considered safe, but its performance needed evaluation in the randomized SPHERE Per-AF trial.
Does a dual-energy lattice-tip mapping and ablation catheter compared to a conventional contact force radiofrequency ablation system affect same day discharge rates and safety in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=418)
randomized
Yes
Does a dual-energy lattice-tip mapping and ablation catheter compared to a conventional contact force radiofrequency ablation system affect same day discharge rates and safety in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Same day discharge after persistent AF ablation can be safely achieved with a novel dual-energy lattice-tip system, with outcomes comparable to conventional radiofrequency ablation.
Supports same-day discharge after persistent AF ablation with the lattice-tip catheter; confirms comparable feasibility and safety to conventional radiofrequency ablation.
Abstract Background Same day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is generally considered safe, since most complications are identified during (or immediately) after the procedure. Objective To evaluate SDD in the SPHERE Per-AF trial. Methods Persistent AF patients were randomized to the dual-energy lattice-tip mapping and ablation catheter (investigational) vs. a conventional contact force radiofrequency ablation system (control). SDD and timing of 30-day procedure- or device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed in the full cohort. In a subset of centers that performed SDD in the trial, predictors of SDD, 30-day readmissions, and mortality rates were assessed. Results SDD was achieved in 229 of 418 (54.8%) patients (55.9% of investigational (n=211) and 53.6% of control (n=207; p=0.64)). Of the remaining patients, 181 (43.3%) were discharged the next day, while 8 (1.9%) were discharged 2-7 days post-ablation. A total of 11 of 14 procedure- or device-related SAEs occurred within the first 3 days post procedure, with no relevant difference between SDD and overnight stay. In a subset of 14 centers with at least one SDD in the trial, procedure duration, procedure end time and race predicted overnight stay (all p<0.01). All-cause 30-day readmission rates were similar between arms (p=0.53) and discharge protocols (p=0.19), with no deaths within 30 days. Conclusion Among the traditional thermal ablation technologies, SDD protocols have been well established and safely practiced. Here, SDD was safely achieved, with no significant differences in outcome when performed with the investigational system compared to a conventional contact-force radiofrequency ablation system. Clinical trial registration NCT05120193
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taigen et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=418). Dual-energy lattice-tip mapping and ablation catheter vs. Conventional contact force radiofrequency ablation system was evaluated on Same day discharge (SDD) (p=0.64). Same day discharge was safely achieved in 55.9% of patients using a dual-energy lattice-tip catheter compared to 53.6% with conventional radiofrequency ablation (p=0.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: