The LIGO-II gravitational-wave interferometers (ca. 2006--2008) are designed to have sensitivities near the standard quantum limit (SQL) in the vicinity of 100 Hz. This paper describes and analyzes possible designs for subsequent LIGO-III interferometers that can beat the SQL. These designs are identical to a conventional broad band interferometer (without signal recycling), except for new input and/or output optics. Three designs are analyzed: (i) a squeezed-input interferometer (conceived by Unruh based on earlier work of Caves) in which squeezed vacuum with frequency-dependent (FD) squeeze angle is injected into the interferometer's dark port; (ii) a variational-output interferometer (conceived in a different form by Vyatchanin, Matsko and Zubova), in which homodyne detection with FD homodyne phase is performed on the output light; and (iii) a squeezed-variational interferometer with squeezed input and FD-homodyne output. It is shown that the FD squeezed-input light can be produced by sending ordinary squeezed light through two successive Fabry-P\'erot filter cavities before injection into the interferometer, and FD-homodyne detection can be achieved by sending the output light through two filter cavities before ordinary homodyne detection. With anticipated technology (power squeeze factor e^-2R=0.1 for input squeezed vacuum and net fractional loss of signal power in arm cavities and output optical train ε*=0.01) and using an input laser power Iₒ in units of that required to reach the SQL (the planned LIGO-II power, ISQL), the three types of interferometer could beat the amplitude SQL at 100 Hz by the following amounts μ≡√Sₕ/√SₕSQL and with the following corresponding increase V=1/μ³ in the volume of the universe that can be searched for a given noncosmological source: Squeezedinput---μ√e^-2R0.3 and V1/0.3³30 using Iₒ/ISQL=1. Variational-output---με*1/40.3 and V30 but only if the optics can handle a ten times larger power: Iₒ/ISQL1/√ε*=10. Squeezedvarational---μ=1.3(e^-2Rε*)1/40.24 and V80 using Iₒ/ISQL=1; and μ(e^-2Rε*)1/40.18 and V180 using Iₒ/ISQL=√e^-2R/ε*3.2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimble et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: