Key result
A single dose of moxalactam was as effective as an extended 48-hour course in preventing wound infection after contaminated abdominal surgery (5.4% vs 6.1%).
Why the study?
Does a single dose of moxalactam prevent wound infection as effectively as an extended course in patients undergoing contaminated abdominal surgery?
RCT (n=1,027)
Does a single dose of moxalactam prevent wound infection as effectively as an extended course in patients undergoing contaminated abdominal surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 6.1%
A single 1 g intravenous dose of moxalactam is as effective as an extended 48-hour course for preventing wound infection after contaminated abdominal surgery.
Single-dose moxalactam may suffice for prophylaxis; leaves open confirmation in larger randomized trials.
Although perioperative antibiotic cover reduces the incidence of septic complications associated with abdominal surgery, the optimum duration of antibiotic exposure is open to question. This clinical trial compared the efficacy of a single dose of moxalactam (1 g intravenously) with an extended course of moxalactam (1 g intravenously for eight doses) in 1027 patients undergoing contaminated abdominal surgery. The wound infection rate was 5.4% (28/519) for the single-dose schedule and 6.1% (31/508) for the extended-cover regimen (the respective 95% confidence intervals being 3.6% to 7.7% and 4.2% to 8.6%). Over 80% of all patients undergoing abdominal surgery during the period of study were entered into the trial. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications between the two groups under study. It is concluded that a single dose of moxalactam is as effective as a 48-hour course when attempting to prevent infection after contaminated abdominal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John C. Hall (1989) conducted an RCT in Contaminated abdominal surgery (n=1,027). Moxalactam vs. Moxalactam 1 g intravenously for eight doses was evaluated on Wound infection rate. A single dose of moxalactam was as effective as an extended 48-hour course in preventing wound infection after contaminated abdominal surgery (5.4% vs 6.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: