PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1994Geophysical Research Letters3,494 citations

Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions

View Full Paper
CDCharles DeMetsRGRichard G. GordonDADonald F. Argus

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of recent geomagnetic time scale revisions on the NUVEL‐1 plate motion model estimates.
  • Modified the NUVEL‐1 model by multiplying angular velocities by a constant (α=0.9562) to create NUVEL‐1A.
  • Compared NUVEL‐1 and NUVEL‐1A angular velocities with space geodetic measurements.
  • Revised tables of angular velocities and uncertainties were generated.
  • Space geodetic measurements show an average discrepancy of 6±1% slower than NUVEL‐1 estimates.
  • This discrepancy is reduced to less than 2% when comparing NUVEL‐1A with space geodetic rates.

Abstract

Recent revisions to the geomagnetic time scale indicate that global plate motion model NUVEL‐1 should be modified for comparison with other rates of motion including those estimated from space geodetic measurements. The optimal recalibration, which is a compromise among slightly different calibrations appropriate for slow, medium, and fast rates of seafloor spreading, is to multiply NUVEL‐1 angular velocities by a constant, α, of 0.9562. We refer to this simply recalibrated plate motion model as NUVEL‐1A, and give correspondingly revised tables of angular velocities and uncertainties. Published work indicates that space geodetic rates are slower on average than those calculated from NUVEL‐1 by 6±1%. This average discrepancy is reduced to less than 2% when space geodetic rates are instead compared with NUVEL‐1A.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DeMets et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15525079ff98d0de4e7071https://doi.org/10.1029/94gl02118
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper