Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents a renewed critical engagement with normative power. It overcomes the conceptual vagueness and force-for-good connotation inherent in much of the scholarship on normative power by privileging the ontological question and concentrates on what is a normative power. It offers a characterization of normative power and argues that neither universal norms nor a particular set of instruments can be considered as ontological necessities. They do determine the forms of normative power: cosmopolitan; soft imperialist; and despotic. The four-step methodology, presented in this article, to ‘spot’ a normative power and the forms of normative power rely on a clear distinction between the ethical and the ontological question on normative power. It does not ignore ethical considerations; rather the comparison of different forms of normative power offers the intellectual tools to recognize deviations from the ethical ideal-type of cosmopolitan normative power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elisabeth De Zutter (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: