Key result
Successful distal CS-LA disconnection linked to ~49% fewer atrial arrhythmia recurrences versus failed block.
Why the study?
The relative contributions of the distal coronary sinus-left atrial connection to persistent AF with various degrees of atrial fibrosis remain unknown.
Does successful blocking of the distal coronary sinus-left atrial connection reduce the inducible rate of acute AF and recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=71)
No
Does successful blocking of the distal coronary sinus-left atrial connection reduce the inducible rate of acute AF and recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 25.5% vs 50%
p-value: p=0.039
Successfully blocking the distal coronary sinus-left atrial connection during ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation reduces acute AF inducibility and middle-term arrhythmia recurrence.
Distal CS-LA disconnection may lower recurrences after persistent AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background The musculature of the coronary sinus (CS), especially its distal connection with the post wall of the left atrial (LA), has been associated with the genesis and maintenance of atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relative contributions of the distal coronary sinus (CSD)-LA connection to PersAF with various degrees of atrial fibrosis remain unknown. Objective This study aimed to explore the different roles of blocking the CSD-LA connection in the induction of acute AF and middle-term follow-up of recurrence among PersAF patients with various degrees of LA fibrosis. Methods and results A retrospective cohort of 71 patients with drug-refractory and symptomatic PersAF underwent ablation for the first time were studied. The population was divided into two groups according to disconnection of the CSD-LA or not. All patients enrolled accepted the unified ablation procedure (circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation and ablation of the CSD-LA connection). Group A ( n = 47) successfully blocked the CSD-LA electrical connection and Group B ( n = 24) failed. Twenty-five patients could be induced into sustained AF in the Group A compared to 20 in the Group B (53.2 vs. 83.3%, p = 0.013). After a mean follow-up of 185 ± 8 days, 24 (33.8%) patients experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrences. The Group A had significantly fewer recurrences (25.5%) compared to Group B (50%). Meanwhile, in Group A, the ROC curve analysis suggested that in the case of blocking CSD-LA, low voltage area (LVA) of LA can act as a predictive factor for acute AF induction (AUC = 0.943, Cut-off = 0.190, P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 92.3 and 90.5%, and middle-term recurrence (AUC = 0.889, Cut-off = 0.196, P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 65.7%. Conclusion Disconnection of CSD-LA could reduce the inducible rate of acute AF and the recurrences of atrial arrhythmia during middle-term follow-up. The PersAF patients with CSD-LA muscular connection blocked, experienced a higher acute AF inducible rate with larger proportion of LVA of LA (≥19%) and a higher recurrent rate of atrial arrhythmias with a larger proportion of LA fibrosis (≥19.6%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=71). Successful disconnection of distal coronary sinus-left atrial (CSD-LA) connection vs. Failed disconnection of CSD-LA connection was evaluated on Middle-term follow-up of atrial arrhythmia recurrences (p=0.039). Successful disconnection of the distal coronary sinus-left atrial muscular connection significantly reduced middle-term atrial arrhythmia recurrences to 25.5% compared to 50.0% in patients where the block failed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: