This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this paper we describe an approach to the identification of "translationese" based on monolingual comparable corpora and machine learning techniques for text categorization. The paper on experiments in which support vector machines (SVMs) are employed to recognize translated text in a corpus of Italian articles from the geopolitical domain. An ensemble of SVMs reaches 86.7% accuracy with 89.3% precision and 83.3% recall on this . A preliminary analysis of the features used by the SVMs that the distribution of function words and morphosyntactic in general, and personal pronouns and adverbs in are among the cues used by the SVMs to perform the task. A follow-up experiment shows that the attained by SVMs is well above the average performance of 10 human subjects, including 5 professional translators, on the same task. Our results offer solid evidence supporting the translationese hypothesis, and our method seems to have promising applications in translation studies and more in general in quantitative style analysis. Implications for the machine /text categorization community are equally important, because this is a novel application, and especially because we explicit evidence that a relatively knowledge-poor machine algorithm can outperform human beings in a text task.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Baroni (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: